The book started out good. But then the author’s bias clearly took over. It’s too bad. He wrote this book after the first trial and not after the second trial. As someone who watched both the first and second trial, there was a lot of stuff that came out in both trials, but specifically in the second trial that proved there was something else going on. Call it conspiracy or otherwise. A lot of the things that the author was so determined to push across as the only way it could be were dispelled in the second trial. It’s amazing how he feels so right about his theories on what happened and yet the first trial was a hung jury and the second trial acquitted Karen Read. He needs to go back and start over again.
Also, he left off a lot of stuff that was in both trials that specifically pointed at Higgins and Albert that weren’t on the up and up.