They should definitely turn this into a movie. A great addition to an already successful franchise
View: audiovisceral - page 11
Good detective story not good Sherlock Holmes story
Review from Sherlock Holmes and the Red Demon: A Minnesota Mystery →
The plot wasn’t bad. But the fact that it is written as Sherlock Holmes story is what put me off. The writer seen unable to understand Doyle’s Holmes cold logical behaviour, which might be rude sometimes but never this cruel. It seems Holmes make lots of stupid mistakes that is not his characteristics. In addition,..
This story is very much focused on Shadwell Rafferty with Holmes and Watson in bit parts only. As part of this approach we get Watson’s notes read out with references to H., W., and SF, etc. It doesn’t read like a Sherlock Holmes novel and the references to initials is irritating and a distraction at..
True to Style, but Thought the Plot was Slow For a Book Length Story
Review from Sherlock Holmes and the Rune Stone Mystery →
Relative good original Doyle style, though not as MacBird and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. Mostly, well fleshed out and interesting characters who are the high point of the book and the primary ringer to keep you reading to the end. Plot is not that great, which is common in the original short stories, but is a noticeable..
I have read a lot of Sherlock Holmes based books. This was not the best and not the worst. I don’t understand why the whole series is in Minnesota. One book set there was ok for something different, but a whole series? It’s not a very interesting place. Sorry, Minnesota. I would enjoy another setting…
When an author chooses to write a novel where Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson are the lead characters, they had better bring their A-game. In Doyle’s originals,both Holmes and Watson have such distinctive styles, both in their vocabulary and in their methods of questioning/interrogating witnesses. It’s probably why so many readers back at the turn..




