did not like all the religious stuff was expecting,something different. was supposed to be about surviving an emp.
View: kevinspierce - page 1994
Magnificently well written and imaginative. A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A!
Loved it!
Review from Shoot Like a Girl →
I laughed, I fought back tears, and I learned some cool tricks! L.L. Akers really makes the characters jump off the page!
I laughed, I fought back tears, and I learned some cool tricks! L.L. Akers really makes the characters jump off the page! Can’t wait for the next installment!
Pick Your Apocalypse (Part One)
Review from Ash →
The story and series premise that the same characters go through a variety of different apocalypse scenarios in each book is interesting. This book covers a nuclear attack and the survivors content with fallout, bad guys and finding safe and clean places. The characters have some development, but the book feels a bit rushed to..
Overall this is a good book. I really enjoy the characters and the storyline. I understand this is post-apocalyptic fantasy however, the breakdown seem to be immediate. Pace at which the bad took place seem to be hyperbolic in that everyone understood how bad things were immediately. the seems far-fetched in the information age that..
Not Bad
Review from American Survivor →
I’ve been thru a few apocalyptic genre books and this one was interesting. Average Joe with some hunting, camping skills that gets caught up in throwback America in worse shape. People having to learn how to survive when all else fails. I will go on to the next book in this series to see where..
Life on the farm
Review from Good Fences →
Great story. Life on the farm before and after the SHTF. About as real as you can find.
The first 2 books are Great, however not the 3 one. The books are very biblical sound and every chapter was accompanied with scriptures about the things that will happen in the chapter. Judging from how the book is written the author must have spent long hours doing research about the guns and everything that..
Needs an epilogue
Review from The Man with the Candy →
This case is well organized and thoroughly researched as far as it goes, but it occurred in the seventies, so there’s no excuse for the lack of an outcome. Two confessions were made, but there’s no mention of charges, convictions, sentences, or anything else beyond these confessions. Kevin Pierce delivered his customary outstanding performance. NOTE:..