Yeah I guess this is where I should write A review? I don’t know? I didn’t seem to struggle too much to finish? Yeah I think my most memorable moment was Geting into and read this book! Heck I wouldn’t read this book if I didn’t like the narrator most of the time I picked..
Review from The Lost Starship →
The plot is not dense if that makes any sense. The characters take themselves way to serious. The author really tries hard to create tension and drama within the story and succeeds at a YA level. I was in between books and just finished the second in the series. It’s just ok. I not going..
Review from Khrushchev →
This book provided tons of context on the modern history of Russia, with its many stumbles and triumphs in the attempt to convert the world to communism.
Review from The Lost Starship →
Worst sci-fi I’ve listened to in a long time. Terrible job at characterization, everyone feels flat and one dimensional, with stupid and cringey dialog. There are long stretches of boring descriptions of mundane things or boring exposition dumps, then something that might be interesting gets glossed over in two sentences. This would be a good..
Review from Yeager →
That would be Chuck Yeager. What a story and what a life. An American legend we can forever be proud of.
Review from Awaken Online: Retribution →
It remains a good story. The narrator is fine, but doesn’t generate much difference in character for the different voices. More than that, though is something I routinely comment on with respect to this genre… After the first or second in a series the thing that brought people in, character development, takes a backseat to..
Review from John Hancock →
I found Harlow Giles Unger’s biography of John Hancock most interesting. Unger did an excellent job of weaving facts acquired from various sources into a fairly fast-moving story. The research was meticulous and Unger’s storytelling was superb. My only complaint is Unger’s approach to Samuel Adams and John Quincy Adams. I think he overdid the..
Review from Awaken Online: Catharsis →
TL;DR: Don’t read if you don’t like evil main characters. I had to stop after about an hour, MC is essentially a school shooter in training and does bat an eye at being called Chaotic Evil. Story is patchy ND not well written. Narrator is ok, but definitely doesn’t help with the general vibe and..
This is a superb account of the Committee of Public Safety–nuanced, detailed, and fair-minded. What is difficult to overlook is that the “performance” (i.e., the narrator) cannot pronounce even common words such as “Vendee” and “Robespierre,” let alone “Eglantine” as in Fabre d’Eglantine.
If you like books about the three above this is a great book for you. It’s like Chuck and his family and friends are telling you the story of his life.